Possibly the Greatest Example of Uni-Watching Ever

You probably don’t realize this — I didn’t realize it myself until a few days ago — but today is a very special day in the annals of uni-watching. For it was 77 years ago today, on Feb. 14, 1937, that the single greatest piece of uni-watchery I’ve ever encountered was published. Today we will take a closer look at, and pay tribute to, that epic screed.

First, let’s set the stage with some quick background: During the five-season span beginning in 1937, Chicago Cubs owner Philip K. Wrigley and his art director, Otis Shepard (who designed lots of Cubs program covers and Wrigley’s gum ads over the years), embarked on the most ambitious series of uniform innovations the sport had ever seen. They began in 1937 with the first zippered jersey. Three years later, in 1940, came baseball’s first vest and first (and still only) pleated pants. The finishing touch came in 1941: the game’s first powder blue uniform.

Lots was written about these uniform innovations at the time, and much of it was hilarious. I’m particularly fond of this Sporting News item about the 1941 powder blues, for example. But nothing I’ve previously seen can compare with this piece that was published in The Chicago Tribune 77 years ago today (click to enlarge):

chicago tribue, 2-14-37.png

The article was recently sent my way by Bill Francis, a researcher at the Baseball Hall of Fame, who recently stumbled across and was nice enough to send it my way. It runs 1,341 words — a little longer than the typical length of my ESPN columns — and is nothing short of a masterpiece. It has witty observations from its author, tons of quotes from Otis Shepard that give insights into his creative process, and several bits of genuine uniform news that we — or at least I — hadn’t previously been aware of. (It also taught me several new words, including anent, garniture, and appurtenance. I think it’s safe to say the article’s author, Edward Burns, was getting pretty well acquainted with his thesaurus.)

Even when viewed at the click-enlarged size, the article is hard to read, so I’ve transcribed the whole thing for you. It appears below, with all its original syntax and punctuation left intact. The only adjustments are that I’ve marked a few key passages with boldface footnotes, which correspond to numbered notes that follow the article.

Even if you don’t care about the Cubs or about MLB, you’ll want to read this — trust me. Here we go.

———

Add Our Cubs to Nation’s Well Dressed Gents: Their 1937 Suits Have More Color Than Mr. Dean

By Edward Burns

The Cubs sartorially have gone artistic in a big and pleasant way. For weeks Otis Shepard, art director of the Wrigley company, with Gabby Hartnett and Stan Hack serving as mannequins, has been submitting costume designs to President P.K. Wrigley and other Cub officials. The effort has now been rewarded by dazzling accomplishment.

Manufacturers of uniforms, in the past accused of being a trifle hidebound in the baseball department, have been yowling not so secretly at the revolutionary trend toward dressiness on the baseball field. But amidst scream that “the players won’t stand for it” and “you can’t get a ball player to go for that,” the manufacturers executed six home and six road costumes, all of which were paraded by Gabby and Stan. The first five models of each series were rejected. But the No. 6 models clicked, not only with Art Director Shepard and Owner Wrigley but with Harnett, Hack, and several other players called in to refute the manufacturer’s moans anent what the players would and would stand for in the matter of garniture.

Furthermore, It’s All for Art and Beauty
Final orders for quantity tailoring have just been placed. In mid-April at Wrigley Field, the Cubs will burst forth in novel and great resplendence.

Before we go any farther in this piece, we want you to understand that Mr. Shepard is no he dressmaker. Not that he dressmakers aren’t all right.(1) But if Mr. Shepard were a he dressmaker you’d have to suspect that in functioning in the Cub costume matter he would be simply drumming up some business for himself. Everything Mr. Shepard has done for the Cubs is in the cause of art and beauty.

Mr. Shapard designs all of the Wrigley company’s posters which you see in newspaper advertisements, on the billboards, in street cards, on trucks, and in drug store and other windows. He has designed many gum packages, cartons, etc. He has a wide reputation as one of the leading authorities on the commercial application and the psychology of color reactions.

Old Costumes Cause Him Pain
Though a very busy man in his own highly specialized field, Mr. Shepard for several years has been breaking out with the hives whenever he has beheld a conventional baseball uniform. Being a Wrigley executive he naturally has felt deepest pain in his sense of the esthetic on looking at the Cub costumes, though by being on the Pacific coast at the time he was spared the harrowing experience of looking upon Manager Grimm’s costume that stretch a year or so ago when Charley got the notion that it was good luck to wear a filthy uniform.(2)

Mr. Shepard, if you please, now will tell you about the caparisons of the 1937 Cubs, while we reserve the privilege of interjecting a parenthetical thought here and there:

“The first thing I want to emphasize is that there has been no tendency toward making the Cubs look like chorus boys.” [There is nothing theatrical about Mr. Shepard except that while he is in his studio he wears ultra-baggy pantaloons, a gaucho shirt, and other appurtenances of the artists who wander around the courtyards in the opening scenes of light operas, not to mention Greenwich Village.(3)]

Color Has More Value in Solid Areas
“The first princile I applied in evolving the new Cub uniforms is that color has more value in solid areas than in stripes. Solid color areas carry greater distances and can be seen as the color they are at greater distance. For instance, the Cub uniforms of the past have been trimmed with narrow red and blue stripes. At a distance of a few feet the stripe appears purple and a few feet farther away it can’t be seen at all.” [Looks like you've got something there, Otis.]

“colors have been used that can be seen from the stands in all their vivid richness. Insignia, too, can be seen from the stands, and there are no more hemstitched or embroidered teddy bears to perplex and strain the eye.” [You're right, Mr. Shepard. We never could make out that bear and those red and midnight blue socks always looked black to us.]

“Before I discuss color in detail I’ll devote some time to describing the design. The necks are cut with a deeper V than ever before.(4) These V’s were studied very carefully on the mannequins and had no feminizing effect whatever. In fact the boys looked more athletic than heretofore.” [That's all right with Gabby and Stan, but how about players with large and fluttering Adam's apples?]

The Only Button Is on Their Caps
“There won’t be a button in the entire wardrobe, except the bright red ones atop the caps. Manager Jim Dykes of the White Sox is the only player who ever had a zipper uniform and he did get his until last year.(5) Mr. Dykes is a zipper enthusiast, claiming that he can get away to his after dinner speaking much earlier. The Cubs have adopted the zippers for a different reason — better draping.” [Draping or no draping, Shep, we still think the quick getaway feature will register best with the players.]

“For some reason sock manufacturers always have made socks long enough to reach 10 or 12 inches about the knee. A ball player wears a thin white cotton sock under his costume sock. After he has rolled own both to his knees he naturally has a knock-kneed appearance. And this distortion establishes an optical contrast which, combined with the misplacing of stripes, destroys the athletic appearance of a player’s calf. The new Cubs socks will be less than knee length and the stripes will be placed around the ankle, not the calf.”(6) [Nice going, Otis. We'd like to have you talk to Mr. Comiskey some time.]

Then They go Back to the Rag Bag
“Six years ago the Cubs started the use of uniform sweatshirts, then, after others had taken up the plan, went back to the rag bag for their tattered and greasy private ones.(7) The sleeves of the former uniform sweatshirts were such a dark blue they looked black. The new Cub sleeves will be a brilliant electric blue.” [We understand that the hidebound uniform salesman picked this as one of the spots to tell Mr. Wrigley what his player wouldn't wear. And Mr. Wrigley properly and firmly said they'd wear ’em at least till next fall without arbitration until they win a National League pennant or beat the White Sox in a city series.]

“The uniforms will be tailored differently than heretofore. The elimination of the sock roll has resulted in a different design for the pants, including a redraping of the conventional dropping seat. There will be a half inch stripe on each trouser leg.” [Otis, Charley Grimm is going to be awfully angry with ou if you've actually eliminated the drooping seat. Personally Charlie is bound to feel stifled.]

What About the Plug Tobacco?
“There are to be no ornate flaps on the hip pockets. In fact, no flaps of any kind.”(8) [Why, Mr. Shepard, how are the bridegrooms on the team to conceal the fact that they carry fine cut, scrap, or plug tobacco?]

“The predominant color notes in both the white home uniforms and the bluish-gray road uniforms are bright red and brilliant blue.(9) The 1/2-inch pants stripes on the white uniforms will be blue and on the gray uniforms they will be red. The lettering on the shirts also will be in bright red and blue combinations — but the large capital C in Chicago and in Cubs will not be gingerbready as heretofore. It will be a strong letter that any one with good eyes can see at a reasonable distance.” [Sorry, Mr. Shepard, we can't reproduce in color this sketch you've given us, but we'll tell the Sunday ed that there'll be a chance for a swell roto picture when a few of the boys can pose that famous Tribune camera, all dressed up in their new Shepard creations.]

———

Okay, so that’s the article. Here are my notes corresponding to the boldface numbers sprinkled throughout the piece:

1. This sentence is essentially saying, “Not that there’s anything wrong with that” a full 56 years (almost to the day!) before Seinfeld popularized that phrase.

2. This is the first I’ve heard of Cubs skipper Charley Grimm superstitiously wearing a dirty uniform for good luck. I did a bit of research in an attempt to confirm the story but came up empty. If anyone would like to follow up, I’d love to learn more about this.

3. The author appears to be not-so-subtly suggesting that Shepard is gay — only this time without the Seinfeld-esque disclaimer.

4. I hadn’t been aware of the Cubbies’ 1937 jerseys having a deeper V-neck. This definitely isn’t shown in Marc Okkonen’s templates, and photos of the ’37 jerseys don’t appear to show a deeper V either (click to enlarge):

1937.png

Maybe this is something that was planned but eventually scrapped. Anyone know more?

5. So according to this account, although the ’37 Cubs were the first full team to wear zippered jerseys, White Sox player-manager Jimmy Dykes was the first individual to wear a zippered jersey, in 1936. I went looking for a primary-source confirmation of this and couldn’t find any written accounts. I did, however, find this photo of Dykes wearing a zippered jersey while his three coaches — Muddy Ruel, Billy Webb, and Jimmy Austin — wore buttons:

zipper.jpg

Now, the White Sox wore those buttoned home jerseys in 1936 and 1937, and Dykes had the same coaching staff for both of those seasons, so that photo could be from either ’36 and ’37. But it seems unlikely that the Tribune would attribute something to the Chisox in an article about the Cubs unless it was true, and I’d say the photo, while not definitively dated, is persuasive. I’m inclined to believe this one.

6. This is the first time I’ve ever heard of baseball socks (or in this case stirrups) being made to a shorter length. More notably, it’s also the first time I’ve heard of the stirrup stripes being lowered in ’37. Sure enough, Okkonen had that covered, although you have to look closely to see it in his templates. And yes, if you look at old photos, the stripes do appear to be riding a bit low:

It’s worth noting that the 1937 home uni is part of the Cubs’ throwback program this season, and I’m told they’ll be wearing striped stirrups. It’ll be interesting to see if they’re properly below calf-level.

7. I’m not sure what to make of this. Let’s look at that quote from Shepard again: “Six years ago the Cubs started the use of uniform sweatshirts, then, after others had taken up the plan, went back to the rag bag for their tattered and greasy private ones.” So was he saying that the Cubs’ players used to wear whatever ratty old undershirt they had lying around, and then they switched to (and even pioneered the use of) standardized team undershirts, and then they went back to non-standardized undershirts? Anyone know more about this?

8. The implication here, although it’s not explicitly stated, is that the ’37 Cubs were the first MLB team to wear pants with welt pockets instead of flap pockets. This is something that, to my knowledge, has never been documented.

9. Interesting that the road uni is described as “bluish gray.” That’s definitely not shown in Okkonen’s depiction. Of course, color photos from that era are rare, so it’s hard to confirm this one way or the other.

One additional note: The article’s headline refers to the uniforms having “More Color Than Mr. Dean.” I have no idea what this means. Anyone know who Mr. Dean might have been?

The guy who wrote this article, Ed Burns, was a longtime Tribune sportswriter. While the Cubs wore those Shepard-designed uniforms in 1937, Burns busied himself with a series of articles about every big league park. The series, called “Burns-Eye Views of Big Time Parks,” is collected in full here, and is definitely worth checking out. (Burns died in 1955 and was later honored by Purdue and Indiana, whose football rivalry he had covered for many years.)

Okay, that’s a wrap. Big thanks to Bill Francis for sending this old article my way, and extra-big thanks to Ed Burns for writing it. Seventy-seven years later, it holds up as a classic of the uni-watching genre.

+ + + + +

This is too perfect: A few ESPN columns ago, I wrote, “Every Olympics, it seems, there’s one piece of performance attire that generates a lot of buzz. … For Sochi, the chatter is centering around Under Armour’s new suit for the U.S. speed skating team, called the Mach 39, which was produced in conjunction with the aerospace company Lockheed Martin.”

A lot of hype and several races later, the American speed skaters are having a miserable Olympics. And according to The Wall Street Journal, which broke the story yesterday, the Americans’ lousy performance is likely due to a design flaw in the suits. As Deadspin quickly pointed out, the American skaters weren’t able to wear the new suit on the World Cup circuit because Under Armour wanted a big, splashy unveiling just prior to the Olympics.

Hmmmm, you mean a sci-fi-ish suit name, a collaboration with a defense contractor, and a big publicity budget don’t automatically add up to a storybook ending? Shockers.

And here’s the best part: Although some skaters brought other suits along to Sochi, they’re not allowed to wear them, because IOC rules stipulate that all the skaters from a given country have to wear the same design. (The U.S. team has requested a waiver on that requirement. I hope for their sake it’s granted.)

I feel bad for the skaters but not for Under Armour, which has been working this one straight out of the Nike playbook and deserves the comeuppance. Live by the hype, die by the hype. Maybe next time they’ll actually let the athletes try the gear in competition before having them wear it in the biggest event of their lives.

+ + + + +

valentine.png

V-Day: If you’d rather see some Valentine’s-related content on Feb. 14, this Uni Watch entry from two years ago should do the trick. Enjoy.

ESPN reminder: In case you missed it yesterday, my latest ESPN column is a round-up of the latest MLB uni news.

+ + + + +

’Skins Watch: Here’s an old sheet of U. of Illinois logo decals that definitely wouldn’t pass muster today (thanks, Phil).

Baseball News: Too bad this super-cool vintage VFW baseball jersey is too big for me — otherwise I’d snap it up in a sec. … This is pretty cool: The first photos of Willie Mays as a San Francisco Giant (from Roger Faso). … Buried within this article about Auburn baseball is the following: “From the start, [coach Sunny] Golloway has plastered the word ‘Omaha’ all over the team, putting it on the back of Auburn’s practice uniforms, in signs in the team’s offices and all over Plainsman Park itself, a reminder that the Tigers’ ultimate goal is reaching the College World Series.” … Back in 2005, the Dave Matthews Band appeared on the cover of Rolling Stone wearing old-school flannel baseball uniforms. … The Wisconsin Timber Rattlers have announced their promo schedule for 2014, which includes lots of special jerseys. … Hmmm, a White Sox jacket with a Yankees logo. No wonder it was on the clearance rack (from Grant Stupeck).

NFL News: The folks at Scotch/3M are selling tape dispensers shaped like football helmets. Jon Solomonson spotted those at his local Office Depot. … ’Skins QB Robert Griffin III has donated $100,000 worth of equipment to his old high school. … The Bengals’ cheerleaders aren’t allowed to wear underwear, among other ridiculous rules. … This is cool: a year-by-year slideshow of 49ers team portraits (from Jason Charles Franklin).

Hockey News: Interesting piece about how nobody in the crowd was wearing jerseys during two of the most famous moments in hockey history, and how merchandising has changed since then. … Not uni-related but still interesting: Teebz has written a piece on NHL groupies. … The Odessa Jackalopes (NAHL) will be going Pink in the Rink next weekend. … There’s a new children’s book about a nine-year-old girl who’s on a hockey team and wants a really high uni number. … Valentine’s Day jerseys on tap for the Waterloo Blackhawks (from Clint Wrede).

Soccer News: “Earlier this week a soccer team in Iraq unveiled their new jerseys, manufactured by Adidas,” writes Fernando Cardenas. “The jerseys were somewhat nice, but the problem came when it turned out to be identical to the ones worn by the Colombian national team. This is particularly annoying given that Adidas promoted the Iraqi shirt by saying, “The white outlines symbolize the hope for peace in the country…” To some level team rooters always realized this was a marketing trick, but the fact that the jersey was copied from Colombian design just confirmed that suspicion.” … New jersey sponsor for Tottenham.

NBA News: The Nets and Bulls went color-vs.-color last night. … Are sleeved jerseys the future of the NBA? Maybe. … Amir Johnson of the Raptors is injured, but he wore a jersey-style vest on the bench the other night. … Golden State cener Festus Ezeli has purchased uniforms for a local YMCA team. … Adidas is releasing a new Kareem-themed sneaker. When I posted that link on Twitter yesterday, Aaron Flies quipped, “They should’ve called it the Shoe Alcindor.” … These days everything has a secondary logo, even the NBA All-Star Game.

College Hoops News: Western Kentucky is retiring Darel Carrier’s jersey. … Walla Walla Community College’s women’s team wore pink on Wednesday. … Back in 1977ish, Utah State had striped shorts but non-striped jerseys (great find by Jon Kasper).

Olympics News: Here’s an absolutely sensational photo survey of Olympic gear and equipment. … And here’s a good article on how technology often trumps athletics at the Games. … Interesting explanation for why the USA hockey team wears white helmets instead of navy (from Mike Korczynski). … Are the Norwegian curling team’s much-ballyhooed pants actually a violation of curling’s rules? Maybe. … Speaking of the Norwegian curlers, several readers have noted that they’re wearing the same jerseys as the Norwegian national soccer team. … Good info on Alex Ovechkin’s customized Olympics gear (from Matthew Austin). … Good round-up of a few Olympic athletes’ uniforms here (from Geoff Poole). … This is pretty awesome: photos from pairs figure skating with the men Photoshopped out. Genius! … Speaking of figure skating, a Washington Post writer is echoing something I’ve been saying for years: Make the skaters wear standardized uniforms instead of costumes. … “I was watching the Olympic curling coverage of Canada vs. Denmark,” says John Thompsen. “The Danish skip is known by the name Rasmus Stjerne, but his jacket has ‘Hansen’ on the back. The CBC commentator explained that IOC regulations require that competitors go by the name that is listed on their passports, and Stjerne’s real last name is Hansen — Stjerne is his middle name.” Interesting — he apparently gets to wear Stjerne when he’s competing outside of the Olympics. … This is totally awesome: photos from the very first Winter Olympics. Don’t miss (big thanks, Phil).

Grab Bag: Fascinating article about Barbie’s appearance on the new SI swimsuit issue cover. … The secret ingredient for a safer bike helmet is apparently paper (from Tom Mulgrew). … There are apparently some people out there competing to set the world record for the most sponsorship logos on an article of clothing. … Big counterfeit jersey bust announced yesterday. … Kyle Larson and the No. 42 Target team will wear new firesuits throughout the 2014 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series season. There’s a video available here. … Here are some pics of DC-area high school athletes shoveling and playing in the snow in their uniforms. … If you’re into collecting sports figurines, you could do a lot worse than these cute little guys called Oyos (from Chris Falvey). … Good article on the phenomenon of trademark bullying. … Bauer, which is known primarily as a hockey brand, is buying Easton-Bell’s baseball and softball business. … A Texas high school softball team is wearing a memorial patch for their late coach, who died last fall. … UFC is considering the use of a standardized uniform. … Who’s that in the Navy uniform? None other than a young Richard Nixon. … Here’s a new one: The Penn State lacrosse team has a player named Tom LaCrosse! “I cannot think of any other athletes whose last name and sport match,” says Gerry Dincher. … Happy V-Day, New Girl. Looking forward to our weekend getaway!

+ + + + +

Holiday schedule: True story: When my parents got married, they chose Feb. 22 — Washington’s birthday — for their wedding date, figuring their anniversary would always be a holiday. Of course, they couldn’t foresee the advent of President’s Day, which scuttled their plans.

Anyway: Assuming I can shovel my car out of the snow bank where it’s currently entombed, the New Girl and I are getting out of town for the three-day weekend. I’ll have some sort of content on Monday, but it’ll likely be on the short side.

Everyone enjoy your V-Day and your Prez Day weekend, and I’ll see you next week.

 

71 comments to Possibly the Greatest Example of Uni-Watching Ever

  • Cort | February 14, 2014 at 7:35 am |

    Dizzy Dean, perhaps? By 1937, he was a radio commentator with a national reputation. Didn’t English teachers demand he be removed from Cardinal’s broadcasts, because his grammar was so bad?

    • Mark in Shiga | February 14, 2014 at 8:48 am |

      Has to be him (and his colorful-indeed personality). He was pitching for the Cubs when this story was printed.

  • JGregg | February 14, 2014 at 7:42 am |

    I think the Mr Dean referred to would be Dizzy. He ended up pitching for the Cubs in 38 but was known as a colorful character baseball wide.

  • Aaron | February 14, 2014 at 7:42 am |

    Grammar note: I’m assuming you meant “buying” in the Bauer ticker item.

    • Paul Lukas | February 14, 2014 at 7:48 am |

      Thanks — now fixed.

  • John | February 14, 2014 at 7:45 am |

    Maybe the other countries just have faster speed skaters or the Americans just had off days. I’m so tired of USA thinking they’re entitled to gold and if they lose, someone has to be to blame.

    • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 8:00 am |

      You should read the article. Nothing of the attitude you describe is present, and the athletes and coaches specifically mention a number of factors, including others just being faster. It’s not about anyone feeling entitled to win and getting pissy if they lose, it’s about a number of athletes suddenly performing worse than they’re accustomed to.

      • Eltee of DC | February 14, 2014 at 8:19 pm |

        Okay, the US Olympic speed skating team has officially dumped Under Amour and their unis. So now we will see if the cause of the medal drought really is the super speedy suits with the built in drag chutes and Kung Fu grip (on the throat).

        Here’s a bit of advice for Under Armour – next time you want to hire a mili-techy partner to assist in shameless commerce, you might consult with Uni-Watcher extraordinaire, (who has now risen to demi-god status in the Uni-verse) Mr. Arr Scott about doing business with Lockheed (see comment below, man you got it right brother – I salute you).

        You don’t get to the top of the military food chain by actually delivering what you say you will. You get there by “eventually” delivering what you said you would. A much more profitable position.

        http://www.latimes.c...

    • Jeff | February 14, 2014 at 9:58 am |

      arrScott is right on. The interviews of the skaters were anything but entitled. Their humility was respectful. That said, Shani Davis is a two time gold medalists in the 1000, was projected to win it again, had the best start of his career, and still finished 7th. When you’re at that level, details make a difference and it is very plausible that the suit was a contributory factor to their performance.

      • Douglas King | February 14, 2014 at 12:57 pm |

        Shani Davis felt good about his run too. His post-race interview was full of class (didn’t blame a thing, He said he felt it was an average run – hard to tell if he meant that it was “pedestrian” or a effort/performance on par with his usual), he didn’t blame the suits and gave it up to his competitors.

        When you have multiple top skaters under-performing and there doesn’t appear to be an explanation in their form, then the new fancy suits their entire country is wearing may just hold the explanation. I guess its possible all our top skaters slacked off in preparation for the olympics and thus performed worse than usual in the qualifying round and the finals, but that’s unlikely. It would be one thing if they crushed it in their qualifying round and then had a bad skate in the finals but that isn’t what is happening.

        I don’t think we had a shot at Gold in the Women’s 1000m because the winner crushed it with her time (basically making Silver the top prize for everyone who skated after her).

        Shaun White’s performance is an example of a bad outing. Though the half pipe was subpar in quality and he couldn’t get a full run in, during the days leading up to the day of competition, but everyone had to deal with those conditions. Ultimately he chose to do the YOLO Flip (Hate that name, stupid I-Pod – also hate that name), instead of a technically sound round, like the one that got him a 95+ in the qualifying round).

        • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 2:21 pm |

          Exactly. Sometimes athletes just underperform. Sometimes luck is just bad and all the individual performers on a team have an off day all at once. (Or an off April, May, and June all at once, like the 2013 Nats.) But when so many off performances coincide, it’s likely that there’s a systematic, shared problem at work. Maybe the brand-new uniforms with technical innovations that other countries have already tried, tested, and rejected. Or maybe the overall training and preparation regimen systematically disadvantaged the team. Wouldn’t be the first time that’s happened to American athletes at the Olympics. But it’s not bad sportsmanship or whining to acknowledge a possible problem and inquire into causes and solutions. American skaters keep having bad races, but they’re still shaking hands and congratulating the winners.

  • DenverGregg | February 14, 2014 at 7:50 am |

    The most colorful Mr. Dean in sports in 1937 would have to be Dizzy.

    Is appurtenance really an uncommon word to the kids these days? O tempora, o mores! If you’d done crossword puzzles (at least through the 80s), anent would have been old hat. Too bad the author wasn’t familiar with squatchee.

  • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 7:50 am |

    “Prez Day Weekend”? Shouldn’t you be “I’m still calling it Washignton’s Birthday”? Good luck getting away from Bliznarök and enjoy the long weekend if you do!

    • Rob S | February 14, 2014 at 3:04 pm |

      I’m more irritated at the use of “Prez”, because it makes me think of a really goofy DC comic book from the 70s.

  • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 8:12 am |

    This is almost enough to have me rooting for the US speed skaters to keep losing:

    U.S. national long-track team coach Ryan Shimabukuro declined to discuss the suits or Under Armour. “I’m not going to criticize them, even if I was allowed to,” he said. “They’re a great partner. And it’d be stupid to criticize a company that has backed us completely.”

    Even if he was allowed to? And he’d be stupid to speak honestly in a way that might displease his corporate masters? It’s like Under Armour is the Stasi or something.

    Also, why is anyone impressed by Lockheed’s participation? The general pattern of innovation in military aviation is, Lockheed or Boeing get a major contract to build a cool high-tech aircraft with features not quite invented yet. Then, after twice as much time and three times as much money as the original contract called for, the contractor delivers a beautiful aircraft with deep flaws that fails to perform and kills a bunch of pilots. The Defense Department parrots the Lockheed/Boeing line that the aircraft is fine, they’ve just had a string of pilot error in adapting to the wonderful new technology. Then, after hostile congressional hearings and a series of expensive lawsuits settled out of court, Lockheed/Boeing quietly takes most of the guts of the aircraft back to the drawing board, refits the existing planes and changes the designs for the yet-to-be-produced models, and suddenly all the “pilot error” goes away – as do most of the cutting-edge features the original contract called for.

    Which is to say, if you know anything about how competent Lockheed is, you’d naturally expect any skating suit they were involved with designing to be a counterproductive failure for at least the first two Olympics. By 2022, Lockheed would be able to deliver a skating suit that actually worked to the standards of the 2010 games.

    • El Duderino | February 14, 2014 at 9:44 am |

      “In the councils of government, we must guard against the unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for misplaced power exists and will persist.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

      • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 10:01 am |

        Turns out we should also guard against the military-industrial complex in the councils of sport. Which Ike, as an accomplished athlete, should have warned us about.

  • teenchy | February 14, 2014 at 8:30 am |

    Quite the lede today. I’ll have to read it multiple times to soak it all in. Thanks to you and to Mr. Francis.

  • Dumb Guy | February 14, 2014 at 8:31 am |

    Ha! Love the Olympic gear guide. Particularly the speed skates and bobsled entries!!

  • Dumb Guy | February 14, 2014 at 8:33 am |

    I much prefer counterfeit jersey stories when they are really BAD counterfeits and feature photos of how bad they are. Good counterfeit stories aren’t no fun.

    • The Jeff | February 14, 2014 at 8:46 am |

      I hate the inflated dollar values they put out in these stories. Someone selling a counterfeit jersey as an “authentic” for $50 when the real thing is actually $300 doesn’t make the counterfeit jersey suddenly worth $300.

      • Douglas King | February 14, 2014 at 1:15 pm |

        It’s in relation to how much money the real thing would cost.

        I do agree that every counterfeit jersey that is sold does not equal a loss of an Authentic Jersey sale. In fact in my opinion the only league that loses authentic sales thanks to counterfeiting is the NHL. That’s because their cheapest respectable jerseys (Embroidered Crest) are $170, the other 3 leagues have replicas that look good at relatively affordable prices.

  • Stan gable | February 14, 2014 at 8:48 am |

    Hofstra had a player named mike la crosse on their lacrosse team in the 80’s.

    • Dumb Guy | February 14, 2014 at 8:56 am |

      I’ve heard of a college footbal player name Johnny Football.

      • Mark in Shiga | February 14, 2014 at 11:00 am |

        I just today read about an Australian politician named Joe Hockey. He needs to move to the sport he was born to play!

      • Gerry Dincher | February 14, 2014 at 11:50 am |

        Johnny Football doesn’t count.

  • BurghFan | February 14, 2014 at 8:58 am |

    “10 or 12 inches about the knee” should be “above the knee”, which it is in the original.

  • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 9:03 am |

    Kind of sad that 80 years later, baseball still hasn’t realized that narrow stripes of red and blue just look like purple if you’re any further away than the catcher and batter. Widen those stripes!

  • Mike | February 14, 2014 at 9:13 am |

    ESPN reminder: In case you missed it yesterday, my latest ESPN column is a round-up of the latest MLB uni news.

    How long has it been since the “A’s” had an “A’s” jersey? It’s what I remember as a kid. I always envied the “A’s” of my hometown’s little league, who had an exact replica of the A’s late 70’s yellow jerseyed uni. http://exhibits.base...

    Also, asa Red Sox fan .. love that the Sox are going back to the red lettering on the road uni.

    • Matt | February 14, 2014 at 3:55 pm |

      “How long has it been since the “A’s” had an “A’s” jersey?”

      Other than this one?

  • MEANS | February 14, 2014 at 9:27 am |

    There have been secondary logos for NBA All-Star games for over 15 years at least.

  • Bruce Menard | February 14, 2014 at 9:29 am |

    I LOVE the old Cubs uniforms from that era, good stuff! Also, I concur that “Mr. Dean” is obviously Dizzy Dean, who pitched for the Cubs 1938-41. http://www.baseball-...

  • JAson | February 14, 2014 at 10:08 am |

    Here’s a thought for the NFL- just get rid of cheerleaders. There are several teams out there that prove you can have football without the jiggle.

    • Jim Y. | February 14, 2014 at 10:19 am |

      Hell, why not? This commish wants to get rid of extra points and kickoffs, might as well get rid of cheerleaders, too. You don’t ‘need’ them for football, either.

      You don’t need the $12 beers either, but I guarantee they aren’t going anywhere. (Unless to be replaced by the $14 beers.)

      • Dumb Guy | February 14, 2014 at 12:37 pm |

        $12…$14…. It don’t matter. Just don’t up-size!

        http://www.youtube.c...

    • Lee | February 14, 2014 at 11:32 am |

      Or, you know, at least treat them with dignity & respect, like, you know, regular people?

      Doesn’t seem that tough to me.

      Lee

  • Marc-Louis Paprzyca | February 14, 2014 at 10:24 am |

    Barbie is not on the cover of the SI Swimsuit issue. Chrissy Teigen, Nina Agdal and Lily Aldridge are on the cover.(http://swimdaily.si....)

    It is an add for Barbie mocked up as a SI Swimsuit cover. I saw this on NBC last night. Terrible follow up to a story.

    • Marc-Louis Paprzyca | February 14, 2014 at 10:43 am |

      *Ad. Terrible follow up by NBC not you Paul.

  • BrianC | February 14, 2014 at 10:59 am |

    It’s hard to tell, but the interlocking SF on Willie Mays’ hat in the early shots looks like a mock up or prototype, not the serif SF that they wore.

    • Steve D | February 14, 2014 at 11:15 am |

      I saw that too…glad they didn’t use that one.

    • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 4:42 pm |

      Definitely not the logo they went with. The simplicity of the shapes and the uniform thickness of the lines looks like maybe the Giants just had a cap or two embroidered at a local shop as props for photos like this. “I want a black cap with the letters S and F in orange. Can you get me four by Wednesday?” It doesn’t have the feel of a true prototype or early logo. Plus, one of the photos seems to show an embroidery mistake under the F.

  • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 11:02 am |

    Man, the US men are bad at curling this morning. I blame the lackluster pants. Even overcompensatingly hetero Russia is wearing this:

    http://i.thegloss.co...

    And we’ve got, what, plain slacks with a Nike swoosh on one shin?

    • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 11:06 am |

      As I wrote that, the US men scored 3 to tie in the 4th end, so maybe the pants aren’t such a curse after all. Still, our plainly adorned curlers look like they’re from some tiny, poor southern European country, not the U S of effing A.

      • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 2:14 pm |

        Never mind. USA lost embarrassingly by letting Russia steal a decisive point in the 10th. Team America’s lackluster pants are killing us. I don’t mean to suggest that we need to get Lockheed and Under Armour to design us something high-tech, but in a world where you can just go online and order these:

        http://us.loudmouthg...

        … team USA’s lackluster curling costumes are inexcusable.

        • Rob S | February 14, 2014 at 3:13 pm |

          Zubaz for Pyeongchang 2018!

  • Will S | February 14, 2014 at 11:43 am |

    Olympic website has 50 photos from the 1st Winter Olympics.
    http://www.olympic.o...

    • Will S | February 14, 2014 at 11:47 am |

      also has this 2 minute video from then:
      http://www.olympic.o...

    • Dumb Guy | February 14, 2014 at 12:53 pm |

      Those bobsleds are gnarley!!

    • Jimbo | February 14, 2014 at 2:09 pm |

      There is color footage of 1956 Olympic hockey: http://youtu.be/Kip6...
      The goaltender for Canada is Martin Brodeur’s father.

      Uni notes: the US looks like a Ranger’s farm club and the Soviet uniform is a “wow”!

  • Clarybird | February 14, 2014 at 11:47 am |
  • Ty | February 14, 2014 at 11:49 am |

    Paul . . . really enjoyed reading that old article. The “he dressmaker” term and your interpretation of it in reference to the classic “Seinfeld” episode was spot-on. One of my favorite things in the article also had to be the use of the word “pantaloons.” We just don’t hear that word enough these days. It just makes me laugh. It reminds me of Kevin Pollak’s stand-up routine where, while discussing his classic, well-known impression of Christopher Walken, he talks about dreaming of walking into a shopping mall store, and Walken pops up behind the counter saying “WELCOME .. to . . Walken’s House of Pantaloons!! We have all your pantaloon needs . . . .

    Classic

  • Nick Ruggeri | February 14, 2014 at 12:17 pm |

    Paul,

    My wife, Susan, and I will celebrate our 10th anniversary on February 22. Our thinking was similar to your parents: I’d always remember George’s birthday and consequently, my anniversary.

  • Kek | February 14, 2014 at 12:22 pm |

    If you look closely on the Utah State uni, although the entire jersey isn’t striped, the gusset area does have the same striping.

  • Kek | February 14, 2014 at 12:25 pm |

    Also, thank you for compiling the separate Olympic section of the ticker rather than throwing in grab bag. I’ve found the content around and about the games to be very enjoyable.

  • sonia | February 14, 2014 at 12:27 pm |

    Wouldn’t it be great to have been in the room when they decided how to design.”so let’s just –use partial stripes!” And then they presumably went back to whatever they were smoking. Aside from that, though, the Niners look very, very good these days.

  • mild bill | February 14, 2014 at 12:30 pm |

    Thanks for posting the 49er team portraits. My favorite is from 1976; road unis along with a Roos Atkins ad.

    I still recall Lon Simmons doing commercials for Roos Atkins during 49er radio broadcasts.

  • Matthew Lohr | February 14, 2014 at 12:32 pm |

    Olympic jersey note…

    Don’t know if it was mentioned but,as I was watching Canada vs. Austria, I noticed Canadian Martin St. Louis’ sweater has almost a hyphen instead of a period for the shortening of ‘Saint’ in his NOB.

    Also, wanted to mention I like the black Team Canada sweaters.

    • HV-Rob | February 14, 2014 at 2:20 pm |

      Contrary to the letter-writer, I like USA’s white helmets on blue jerseys. Norway also wears white on red and, best of all, the Czech Republic wears blue helmets on red jerseys. Don’t see it too much in North America, but the Kitchener Rangers (OHL) wear, or at least used to, red helmets on their otherwise NYR-copied uniforms. It looked cool, especially over their white jerseys.

  • DJ | February 14, 2014 at 2:22 pm |

    It was mentioned yesterday; “ST-LOUIS” is the French language form.

  • Pat | February 14, 2014 at 2:52 pm |

    As far as the club team from Iraq having matching kits with the Columbian national team and then Adidas pawning off the white parts as being about peace they did the same thing when they revealed the white short and socks for the Columbia kit. It’s all lazy marketing. There had been speculation that FIFA had somehow become more strict with their guidelines regarding one all light kit and one all dark kit but that is completely false. It’s a straight up Adidas marketing thing. Puma have released the new Italy kit with white not blue shorts…
    http://4.bp.blogspot...
    and Nike released the France and Brazil kits with the traditional color schemes…
    http://farm6.staticf...
    http://farm4.staticf...
    Adidas has straight up ruined the German kit with white shorts…
    http://1.bp.blogspot...
    Replaced the traditional black shorts and socks of Argentina with white…
    http://farm6.staticf...
    They gave Columbia white shorts and socks instead of blue and red…
    http://4.bp.blogspot...(1).jpg
    The interesting thing though is that Adidas has given Germany black away shorts that they could substitute in…
    http://footballfashi...
    They made an entire extra set of black shorts and socks that Argentina can use…
    http://i.dailymail.c...
    They are also going to have blue shorts and red socks with the away kits for Columbia(no pic for those but their away kit is red and everything I have read on the web has stated navy shorts and red socks)
    Adidas covered their backsides for when everyone starts complaining come World Cup time.

    • Paul Lukas | February 14, 2014 at 4:50 pm |

      I may have to put a ban on the term “It’s all about marketing.”

      Yes, we KNOW virtually everything in the uni-verse is all about marketing. Sigh…..

      • Pat | February 15, 2014 at 6:25 pm |

        I actually never stated “it’s all about marketing.” However, I did say that “it’s all LAZY marketing” and that “it’s a straight up Adidas marketing thing.” Which at least to me were not an over simplification like the statement of “it’s all about marketing.” I am just ticked that Adidas has straight up ruined the World Cup by giving every single one of their teams non-traditional color schemes. Germany(white instead of black shorts), Argentina(white shorts and socks instead of black), Spain(red shorts instead of blue and using gold instead of yellow as a trim color), Mexico(hideous kits in general but socks that are basically white with a little red), Colombia(white shorts and socks instead of navy and red), Nigeria(neon green instead of regular green) and Japan(neon peach instead of red as a trim) all deserve better than what they got. Russia’s are at least somewhat consistent in that they have alternated between red and maroon. I also would like to apologize for my misspelling of Colombia as Columbia. I literally live like 2 miles from the Columbia River. I thought something didn’t look right and then I caught it after the fact.

  • Douglas King | February 14, 2014 at 3:31 pm |

    I think the amount of black and utter lack of red white and blue is partly to blame on the speed skating uniforms…

    I don’t get why black is being chosen over Navy on some of our recent Olympic outfits. Not only is all black boring, it doesn’t allow the Red and Blue to stand out much on the uniform.

  • hugh.c.mcbride | February 14, 2014 at 3:40 pm |

    If there is a better example of the tail wagging the dog when it comes to uni design, I haven’t seen it:

    “The suits were conceived and tested in a lab, but skaters never got the chance to wear them in competition because Under Armour wanted the press of an Olympic rollout.”

    • arrScott | February 14, 2014 at 4:38 pm |

      Make that the stupid tail wagging the dog. Does UA really believe that there’s so much press coverage of speed skating before the Olympics that letting the athletes use the suits for the preceding season would have softened the PR impact at Sochi?

      Plus, there are really only two ways for a freakin’ speed skating suit to generate significant press attention anyway: It helps the athletes win, or it hinders them and they lose. There is such a thing as bad press. If US athletes take a sack of medals wearing a quirky-looking body suit, the body suit is going to get press attention even if it’s a year old. And if US athletes unexpectedly go home with a bunch of 7th place finishes wearing a quirky-looking body suit, UA is going to get bad publicity even if the suit is brand new and designed by DARPA or Skunk Works or whatever.

      In terms of press and public relations, there’s no upside to holding on to the jersey until the Olympics, while there’s big upside as well as a good chance to avoid a big downside in letting the athletes test it in competition and training in advance.

      • Paul Lukas | February 14, 2014 at 5:11 pm |

        there’s no upside to holding on to the jersey until the Olympics

        When the suits were revealed, it was reported by at least one outlet (I no longer recall which one) that they waited so long to unveil them because they wanted to keep the design innovations secret, so rival teams wouldn’t have time to copy them.

        It still seems kinda fucked to not have the skaters wear the suits in competition before the Olympics, and I still have zero sympathy for UA here, but it’s entirely possible that there were other factors at work besides UA’s desire to maximize buzz.

        • Phil Hecken | February 14, 2014 at 11:08 pm |

          “they waited so long to unveil them because they wanted to keep the design innovations secret, so rival teams wouldn’t have time to copy them.”

          ~~~

          Damn shame they didn’t steal the designs outright. Then we’d be fucking champs!

          USA! USA! USA!

          Fuckin’ speedskatin’ medal ceremony would look like this!

          ‘murica.

  • David Firestone | February 14, 2014 at 3:49 pm |

    Some notes about the Kyle Larson video…first, the day and night schemes was done last year by Jimmie Johnson. It’s not a bad idea, in that the lighter night scheme is easier to see at night. Second, the design of the suits just looks odd. Target appears to be trying to break all the rules with this design, but rules are in place for a reason. The big logo on the stomach, with smaller logos above and below it works because when a driver or crew member is interviewed, all the logos are visible, with the larger logo being represented on shoulder epaulets as well as collars. This new design virtually guarantees that at least a few logos will be obscured, which defeats the purpose entirely. Third, why is there a BFBS suit? There does not, at least at this point appear to be a black car, and I hope there isn’t one. It looks even more out of place with the red stripes, which I don’t see on the other two. The red stripe on the white suit is something that works, so I can forgive it, but why BFBS?

  • Johnny O | February 14, 2014 at 6:57 pm |

    This Under Armour controversy brings up an issue that is somewhat related and has been bugging me for years.

    Companies go to great lengths go to design their Olympic gear. Whether it is for skiing/speed skating/luge etc. and their purpose is for wind reduction and speed, or if it is for snowboarders to show off style. My big gripe are the bibs that cover these uniforms. Why are the needed? Can’t the athletes just carry credentials with them, or their handlers have them? It just seems weird to be that big companies make these great uniforms only to have them covered up by the stupid bibs.

  • Mike Moves | February 15, 2014 at 12:43 am |

    The 49ers team photo gallery has a couple of errors. The 1982 photo is a different 1981 team photo (one from before the Fred Dean trade) and the 1996 photo is a reprint of the 1995 team. They are also missing the 2010 team photo. What they show is 2011. What they have for 2011 is 2012 during the season (complete with Harbaugh photoshopped in because he was at the hospital for the birth of one of his children) and the photo for 2012 is the from that seasons’ Super Bowl.

  • Brett | February 16, 2014 at 2:39 am |

    For the record it looks like they switched back to world cup circuit suits on Saturday… and still did awful. Its possible it isn’t related to the suits at all and more to altitude and air density since they do most training in Utah and Colorado (I believe)